Dunn v. Dunn

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rigler, J.), dated May 27, 1988, as, upon granting his motion to dismiss the first cause of action asserted in the complaint, granted the plaintiff wife leave to replead that cause of action.

*434Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the provision thereof granting the plaintiff leave to replead is deleted.

The plaintiff wife opposed the defendant husband’s motion…