Legal Opinion

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Continental Building Operating Co.

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided January 20, 1956No. 9351PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITTAKER, District Judge.

By our opinion in this cause, of November 9, 1955, Rosenfeld v. Continental Building Operating Company, D.C., 135 F.Supp. 465, we held that the original plaintiff, Rosenfeld, did not have, and had never had, any legal title to, or beneficial interest in this cause of action and was not the real party in interest, but we did not sustain defendant’s motion for a summary judgment — by which the question was raised — , but, instead, we treated and sustained the motion as one to dismiss, but granted leave to the insurer, St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, to come…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Ragan v. Merchants Transfer & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Kincheloe v. FarmerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Shirley M. Russell v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company and Consumers Public Power DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  2. Meredith v. United Air LinesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1966
  3. Forehand v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  4. Asmus v. Capital Region Family PracticeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Oliefabrik v. A. O. Smith Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API