State v. Cato-Perry
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hill, J.:
After our decision in State v. Cato-Perry, 48 Kan. App. 2d 92, 284 P.3d 36 (2012), rev. granted May 29, 2014, this case returns to the Court of Appeals on remand from the Kansas Supreme Court on the issue of whether a charge of acting as a principal or aider and abettor created an alternative means case. Our Supreme Court granted the State’s petition for review, vacated our prior decision, and remanded this case to us to review the matter in light of State v. Betancourt, 299 Kan. 131, 322 P.3d 353 (2014), and State v. Soto, 299 Kan. 102, 322 P.3d 334 (2014). We also consider three…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- State v. SotoSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- State v. BowenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. BetancourtSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019
- State v. McComberCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- dobson/anderson v. Hon. mcclennen/mesa ProsecutorArizona Supreme Court · 2015
- dobson/anderson v. Hon. mcclennen/mesa ProsecutorArizona Supreme Court · 2015