Legal Opinion

United States v. Jesus Adrian Beng-Salazar

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 6, 2006No. 04-50518PublishedCited by 154 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAEZ, Circuit Judge.

Jesus Adrian Beng-Salazar (“Beng”) appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. In a separate memorandum, we affirm Beng’s conviction. In this opinion, we consider Beng’s arguments that his sentence violated the Sixth Amendment and ran afoul of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Beng was sentenced under the now-defunct mandatory Guidelines regime. We hold that Beng’s timely Sixth Amendment objections, based on Apprendi v. New Jersey,…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by154 opinions

  1. United States v. Jose Covian-SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Medina-VillaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. Salazar-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. Becerril-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Felipe Zepeda-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API