Jansen v. Jansen

Opinion

ALVORD, J.

The defendant, Herbert Jansen, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to modify his alimony obligation to the plaintiff, Cheryl Jansen. On appeal, the defendant argues that the court abused its discretion in failing to find a substantial change in circumstances warranting modification of his alimony obligation pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-86 (a).1 Specifically, he contends that his forced retirement is a substantial change in circumstances because *212his annual taxable income decreased as a result We find the defendant’s claim to be meritless and,…