Legal Opinion
Billings v. Billings
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 6, 1999No. AC 18187PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*143 Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendant, George W. Billings III, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motions for contempt and modification and granting the plaintiffs motion for contempt. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) calculated the value of his interest in the marital home, (2) determined that his obligation to maintain life insurance was a property settlement and not alimony, (3) denied his motion for modification and (4) found him in wilful contempt. We reverse in part and affirm in part the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Blake v. BlakeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Bunche v. BuncheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Viglione v. ViglioneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Mallory v. MallorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Passamano v. PassamanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Legnos v. LegnosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Kremenitzer v. KremenitzerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Lee v. BSB Greenwich Mortgage Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Sagalyn v. PedersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Dattolo v. Doar, No. Fa 96 03866769 (Dec. 7, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.