Herrera v. Farrell Construction Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POCHÉ, Acting P. J.
Probate Code section 6540, subdivision (b)(2) provides in pertinent part: “A parent of the decedent who was actually dependent in whole or in part upon the decedent for support . . . may be given such reasonable family allowance out of the estate as the court in its discretion determines is necessary for [his or her] maintenance according to [his or her] circumstances during administration of the estate.”1 We hold that the probate court did not abuse the discretion granted by this statute when it denied a parent’s application for a family allowance solely in order…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- People v. CrandellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re CortezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Gossman v. GossmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Schlyen v. SchlyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- DeGarmo v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Estate of HerreraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992