Legal Opinion

Herrera v. Farrell Construction Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 1992No. A055872PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POCHÉ, Acting P. J.

Probate Code section 6540, subdivision (b)(2) provides in pertinent part: “A parent of the decedent who was actually dependent in whole or in part upon the decedent for support . . . may be given such reasonable family allowance out of the estate as the court in its discretion determines is necessary for [his or her] maintenance according to [his or her] circumstances during administration of the estate.”1 We hold that the probate court did not abuse the discretion granted by this statute when it denied a parent’s application for a family allowance solely in order…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. People v. CrandellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. In Re CortezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Gossman v. GossmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Schlyen v. SchlyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. DeGarmo v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate of HerreraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API