Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. City of Cleveland
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided June 1, 2009No. Case 1:08-CV-1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
[Resolving Doc. Nos. 90, 101, 117 & 147.]
JAMES S. GWIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Karen Palmer and Plaintiffs Jose and Carmen Rodriguez (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) move for partial summary judgment in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. [Docs. 90, 101.] Defendants City of Cleveland, Robert Miller, Gerald Hall, Rasco Davis, and Michael McGrath (collectively, the “Defendants”) cross-move for summary judgment. [Doc. 117.] The Defendants also oppose the motions for partial summary judgment filed by the Plaintiffs, [Doc. 118 ], while the Plaintiffs oppose the summary judgment motion…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Campbell v. City of Springboro, OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- Hunt v. City of Toledo Law DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012
- Ward v. County of CuyahogaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- Cleveland v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2012