Legal Opinion

City of St. Paul v. Butler

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 14, 1883PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by defendants'from an order of the district court for. Ramsey county, Brill, J., presiding, overruling their demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.

Prior to the year 1881, the charter of the city of St. Paul contained provision for a bidder for any contract for public improvements securing the faithful performance of the contract, if let to him, by bond executed to the city. Chapter 93 of the Special Laws of that year, amending parts of the charter, provides, (section 9 :) “In addition to the other bonds required by the city charter, and the acts amendatory thereof, of persons contracting with said city to do any work, labor, or furnish any material, before any contract for the doing of any work, labor, or furnishing any material to or…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jefferson v. AschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Parker v. JefferyOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Fleming v. Northern Tissue Paper MillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Brower Lumber Co. v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Breen v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API