Legal Opinion
Carlisle Corp. v. Uresco Construction Materials, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 10, 1993No. Civ. A. 1:CV-92-1073PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CALDWELL, District Judge.
Pending is the motion for summary judgment of plaintiff Carlisle Corporation (“Car-lisle”). We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a).
I. Facts and Procedural History
Carlisle is a manufacturer of, inter alia, roofing materials, incorporated in Delaware and principally located in Carlisle, Pennsylvania. Uresco Construction Materials, Inc. (“Uresco”), is a Washington corporation principally located in Kent, Washington. In July, 1985, the parties entered into a contract calling for Uresco to serve as distributor or manufacturer’s representative…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- In Re Monongahela Rye Liquors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Travenol Laboratories, Inc. v. Zotal, Ltd.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Amerisourcebergen Corporation v. Dialysist West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Echo, Incorporated, an Illinois Corporation v. The Whitson Company, Inc. D/B/A Power Tool Company, a Tennessee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- AmerisourceBergen Corp. v. Dialysist West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Celex Group, Inc. v. Executive Gallery, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Amerisourcebergen Corporation v. Dialysist West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.