Legal Opinion

Ambrose v. Drew

California Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1903No. S.F. No. 2322PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage given to plaintiff and appellant by the defendant Mahulda C. Drew. The respondent J. H. Barker, as administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Bench Angle, deceased, being made defendant, filed a cross-complaint to foreclose an alleged prior mortgage on the same premises, executed by said Mahulda C. Drew. The other defendants made default. The appellant set up as a defense to the note and mortgage in the cross-complaint of respondent Barker, a want of consideration for its execution. The court found in Barker’s behalf, entered a decree of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schurtz v. RomerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holmes v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. In Re Estate of AngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Camacho v. BalasquideSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1913
  4. Camacho v. BalasquideSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API