Legal Opinion

Cherny v. Emigrant Bank

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 12, 2009No. 08 Civ 5359(VM)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.

Plaintiff Stacy Cherny (“Cherny”) brought this action against defendants Emigrant Bank (“Emigrant”) and John Does 1 to 100, alleging a violation of Section 349 of New York General Business Law (“Section 349”), breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, and negligent misrepresentation. Cherny seeks compensatory and equitable relief for the alleged disclosure of his e-mail address and the potential dissemination of certain confidential information from his account at Emigrant, and he purports to represent a class of plaintiffs who allegedly…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. Iqbal v. HastyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  4. Spool v. World Child International Adoption AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  5. Scs Communications, Inc. And Stephen C. Swid, Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. The Herrick Company, Inc. And Norton Herrick, Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chen v. New Trend Apparel, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. BNP Paribas Mortgage Corp. v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  3. King County v. IKB Deutsche Industriebank AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  4. Icebox-Scoops, Inc. v. Finanz St. Honoré, B.V.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
  5. Jensen v. Cablevision Sys. Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API