Legal Opinion
BNP Paribas Mortgage Corp. v. Bank of America, N.A.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 6, 2013No. Nos. 09 Civ. 9783(RWS), 09 Civ. 9784(RWS)PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (“BoA” or “Defendant”) has moved pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss counts four through twelve of the second amended complaints (“Second Amended Complaints”) filed by Plaintiffs’ BNP Paribas Mortgage Corporation (“BNP”) and BNP Paribas (“BNPP”) (collectively, the “BNP Plaintiffs”) and Deutsche Bank AG (“DB”) and count fourteen of the BNP Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.
The highly skilled advocates on each side have once again been…
2Cases cited89 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Negrete v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Fero v. Excellus Health Plain, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2017
- McDaniel v. LoyaDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Ambac Assurance Corp. v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Phoenix Light SF Ltd. v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.