Legal Opinion

Worthington v. Hanna

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1871PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Error to St. Joseph Circuit. The facts are fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell, Oh. J.

Mrs. Hanna sued Worthington, for haying, as sheriff, seized and sold certain chattels on process against Andrew Hanna, which had been mortgaged to her, and which were in the possession of the firm of McDougall, Nicholas & Abbott, under a security of the same date, which provided that they should take possession and sell goods to pay their own claim, and then turn over any surplus of goods or proceeds to her as sucb second mortgagee. The sheriff seized the property into his own possession under a writ of attachment, and sold it in parcels to different persons, without making…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kermott v. AyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Goulet v. . AsselerNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Manning v. . MonaghanNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  4. Crane v. HardyMichigan Supreme Court · 1848
  5. HighMichigan Supreme Court · 1847

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Scaling v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  2. Sirrine v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Davis v. ZimmermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. White v. PeaseUtah Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Skud v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API