Gilberto Acosta-Olivarria v. Loretta E. Lynch
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge FRIEDLAND; Dissent by Judge RICE.
OPINION
FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judge:
In Garfias-Rodriguez v. Holder, 702 F.3d 504 (9th Cir.2012) (en banc), we reserved the question whether a noncitizen applying for adjustment of immigration status could reasonably rely on an opinion of this court during a period in which the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) had issued a decision that was in tension with our opinion but before the BIA issued a decision directly disagreeing with our opinion. See id. at 522. We now answer that question with respect to Petitioner Acosta-Olivarria and hold that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gonzales v. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Gregorio Perez-Gonzalez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- BRIONESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2007
- Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Istvan Szonyi v. Matthew WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- De Niz Robles v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Joel Silva v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Felipe Betansos v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Istvan Szonyi v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.