De Niz Robles v. Lynch
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GORSUCH, Circuit Judge.
In our constitutional order legislative enactments normally apply only prospectively while judicial decisions also bear retroactive application. But what’s the rule when an executive agency exercises delegated legislative policymaking authority in what looks like a judicial proceeding? That’s the peculiar question posed by this case. It comes to us this way. Buried deep in our immigration laws lie these two provisions: 8 U.S.C. §§ 1255(i)(2)(A) and 1182(a)(9)(C)(i)(I). Enacted first, § 1255(i) grants the Attorney General discretion to “adjust the status” of those who…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Loper Bright Enterprises v. RaimondoSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
- Loper Bright Enterprises v. RaimondoSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
- Gutierrez-Brizuela v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- New Mexico v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Gustavo Monteon-Camargo v. William Barr, U. S. AttCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.