Lebel v. Reagan
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
The plaintiffs, husband and wife, were passengers in an automobile operated by Ormand W. Be-dell and sustained injuries when that motor vehicle collided with a car driven by the defendant. The plaintiffs instituted this duplex complaint for compensation. The defendant presented a motion to the trial court professedly pursuant to Rule 19 (b), Maine Rules of Civil Procedure, 155 Me. 510, to have Ormand W. Bedell, a resident of Saco, Maine, joined as a co-defendant in these conjoined actions. The plaintiffs filed a counter motion for the denial of defendant’s motion, for the assigned reasons…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bedell v. ReaganSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963
- Cleveland v. City of BangorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1895
- Gregware v. PoliquinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1937
- Allison v. HobbsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1901
- Gordon v. LeeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.