Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Lee

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 6, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

The question of leading interest is whether plaintiffj in his single action against two defendants for malpractice as surgeons, has declared them liable jointly for damages arising from the concurrence of actionable wrongs. The judge below holding that, as laid, neither tort, negligence nor liability were the same, and that in actions in form ex delictn there could not be different verdicts for different sums against different defendants upon the same trial, granted motions to dismiss the suit; plaintiff excepted.

The declaration contained six counts for maltreatment of plaintiff’s crushed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Consolidated Ice Machine Co. v. KeiferIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Adler & Co. v. PruittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Allison v. HobbsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1901
  4. Hurley v. Inhabitants of South ThomastonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1906
  5. Hudson v. McNearSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Josselyn v. DearbornSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1948
  2. Arnst v. EstesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1939
  3. Leishman v. BradySuperior Court of Delaware · 1938
  4. Ristan v. FrantzenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  5. Sinclair v. GannettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API