Legal Opinion

Naeseth v. Village of Hibbing

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 18, 1932No. 28,791PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Plaintiff liad a directed verdict. Defendant appeals from the order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial.

For some time before January, 1931, plaintiff had served defendant village as its chief of police. At that time the village had a police civil service commission created and functioning under the statute hereinafter discussed. Under that statute, as we shall see, the commission rather than the village council has the exclusive power to discharge a police officer. Notwithstanding, and in January, 1931, the village council adopted a resolution attempting…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miller v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. State ex rel. Dudley v. DaggettWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Lay v. City of AdrianMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Dawes v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Manson v. Village of ChisholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. Hickok v. MargolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Yaeger v. GiguerreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  4. Cahill v. Beltrami CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. City of Minneapolis v. Village of Brooklyn CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API