Legal Opinion

People v. Barros

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 1992No. 90CA1369PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge ROTHENBERG.

Defendant, Phillip J. Barros, appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court finding him guilty of second degree burglary and theft. We affirm.

The following facts are undisputed. On April 1, 1990, police officer Eggleston was assigned to a Denver residential neighborhood that had experienced a series of burglaries. Officer Eggleston was patrolling the neighborhood in a marked “burglary suppression” car, and was routinely questioning individuals whom she observed in the alleys.

During her morning patrol, one citizen told the officer that there was a man…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. CurtisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. People v. DrakeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. Roelker v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. People v. HazelhurstSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  5. People v. QuinteroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. MiltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. ChavezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. People v. ChavezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. People v. MiltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API