Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Chavez

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 7, 1993No. 92SC76Published

1DissentJustice Vollack

The majority finds that the trial court inadequately advised the defendant John B. Chavez (Chavez) of his right to testify at trial pursuant to People v. Curtis, 681 P.2d 504 (Colo.1984). I disagree. I find that, in light of the purpose underlying Curtis, and of the cases construing our holding in Curtis, the advisement given by the trial court satisfied Curtis. I dissent.

I

We have repeatedly stated that Curtis “requires that the trial judge ensure the defendant’s waiver of his right to testify is intelligently and competently made.” Roelker v. People, 804 P.2d 1336, 1338 (Colo.1991); see…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. People v. CurtisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Roelker v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. Tyler v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  5. People v. McMullenColorado Court of Appeals · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API