Legal Opinion

Eads v. Borman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 2012No. CC 05C18610; CA A137410; SC S058445Published

1Opinion of the Court

277 P.3d 503 (2012)

351 Or. 729

David EADS and Diane Eads, individually and as husband and wife, Petitioners on Review,

v.

Timothy R. BORMAN, D.O.; Salem Hospital, a registered Oregon non-profit corporation; Michael J. George, M.D.; and Salem Radiology Consultants, P.C., an Oregon Professional Corporation, Defendants, and

Willamette Spine Center, LLC, an Oregon corporation, Respondent on Review.

(CC 05C18610; CA A137410; SC S058445).

Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc.

Argued and Submitted March 1, 2011.

Decided April 26, 2012.

Maureen Leonard, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners on review. With…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Bing v. ThunigNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Pamperin v. Trinity Memorial HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Sword v. NKC Hospitals, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Hampton Tree Farms, Inc. v. JewettOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. RobertiOregon Supreme Court · 1982

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API