Legal Opinion
Patrick v. Rice
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided May 23, 1991No. 11220PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHAVEZ, Judge.
This is a quiet title action the plaintiffs undertake pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 7-38-70(D) (Repl.Pamp.1986). Plaintiffs claim that whether or not the state taxation and revenue division (division) complied with the notice statute, NMSA 1978, Section 7-38-66 (Repl.Pamp.1986), regarding the impending sale of their property for delinquent taxes, they were denied due process of law because the attempts to notify them were constitutionally inadequate. Additionally, plaintiffs claim that the division denied them their due process rights because the tax sale price of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Klineline v. BlackhurstNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Plemons v. GaleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Cochrell v. MitchellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Gates v. State, Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- Meadow Farm Realty Corp. v. PekichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.