Legal Opinion

Pensyl's Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1888No. Appeal, No. 28PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 28, July T., 1887, from a decree of O. C. Northumberland Co., dismissing exceptions to an auditor’s report on exceptions to the account of Wm. Pensyl, executor of Mary Ann Pensyl, deceased. Trunkey and Clark, JJ., absent. On Aug. 13, 1883, the executor filed his account charging himself with the amount of the inventory filed, being a debt owing by him to the testatrix; also dividends on ten shares of capital stock in the Mt.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 28, July T., 1887, from a decree of O. C. Northumberland Co., dismissing exceptions to an auditor’s report on exceptions to the account of Wm. Pensyl, executor of Mary Ann Pensyl, deceased. Trunkey and Clark, JJ., absent. On Aug. 13, 1883, the executor filed his account charging himself with the amount of the inventory filed, being a debt owing by him to the testatrix; also dividends on ten shares of capital stock in the Mt. Carmel Savings Bank, interest, etc.; and claimed credit for ten shares of the bank stock subscribed, assessments, etc. Exceptions were filed to these items of…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The court below did well to adopt the report of the learned auditor. That report thoroughly and justly disposed of the case, and that disposition could not have been reversed or disturbed without doing serious injustice to the accountant.

The decree is affirmed at the costs of appellants.

Errata. — On page 368, second line of exception 3, for “in” read “is.” At the end of this exception, add “4” in brackets.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Voorhies v. BloodSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  2. George v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian RelocationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API