Legal Opinion
George v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided June 5, 2025No. 3:24-cv-08102Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Rosita George, No. CV-24-08102-PCT-DGC 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER 12 Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Plaintiff Rosita George, a member of the Navajo Nation, seeks judicial review of an 16 administrative decision by Defendant Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation 17 (“ONHIR”). Doc. 1. The parties have filed cross motions for summary judgment. 18 Docs. 12, 21-1. The issues are fully briefed and oral argument will not aid the Court’s 19 decision. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b);…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- River Runners for Wilderness v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Huidekoper's Lessee v. DouglassSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
- O’KEEFFE’S, INC., Petitioner, v. U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.