Legal Opinion
State v. Firemen's Fund Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 28, 1931No. 3 Div. 944PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.
Appellee is a corporation chartered under the law of the state of California and doing business in this state. The complaint in this case alleges (we quote so much of count B of the complaint as is necessary to an understanding of the question involved), quoting the statute of California:
“Nineteen Hundred and Twenty-four edition of the California Insurance Laws, Political Code, page 49, section 623. The commissioner must require every company now transacting or proposing to transact insurance business by agent or agents in this state (California), before commencing such business to file in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hanover Fire Insurance v. HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Philadelphia Fire Assn. v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- The People v. . Fire Association of Phil'A.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Clark & Murrell v. Port of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Western & Southern Life Ins. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
3Cited by9 opinions
- Beeland Wholesale Co. v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- State v. PraetoriansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Commonwealth v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Phenix City v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- B & L Motor Freight, Inc. v. HeymannNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.