Legal Opinion

Rule v. Link

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 28, 1928No. 11,771PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mir . Justioe Campbell

delivered the opinion of the court.

This action by plaintiffs Link and Kerr against defendant Rule is for recovery of possession of a section of farm lands which plaintiffs had, by written contract, agreed to convey to the defendant; for $5,000 damages for wrongfully withholding possession of the same; for the further sum of $2,500, the value of the use and occu- ' pation thereof. The defendant, after denying the wrongs alleged in the complaint, in his answer set up a counterclaim for damages in the sum of $2,460 for failure of the plaintiffs to carry out the sale…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Florence Oil & Refining Co. v. McCandlessSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  2. Mullen v. BromleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. O'Hara Group Denver, Ltd. v. Marcor Housing Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  2. Pierce v. Marland Oil Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  3. Emery v. Medal Building CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  4. White v. EvansSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  5. Murdock v. PopeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API