Rule v. Link
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
Mir . Justioe Campbell
delivered the opinion of the court.
This action by plaintiffs Link and Kerr against defendant Rule is for recovery of possession of a section of farm lands which plaintiffs had, by written contract, agreed to convey to the defendant; for $5,000 damages for wrongfully withholding possession of the same; for the further sum of $2,500, the value of the use and occu- ' pation thereof. The defendant, after denying the wrongs alleged in the complaint, in his answer set up a counterclaim for damages in the sum of $2,460 for failure of the plaintiffs to carry out the sale…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Florence Oil & Refining Co. v. McCandlessSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
- Mullen v. BromleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
3Cited by6 opinions
- O'Hara Group Denver, Ltd. v. Marcor Housing Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- Pierce v. Marland Oil Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
- Emery v. Medal Building CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- White v. EvansSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
- Murdock v. PopeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.