Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Marland Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 20, 1929No. 12,003PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

Pierce and McCall, plaintiffs below, brought action against Marland Oil Company of Colorado to recover damages for alleged breach of contract, to which several defenses were interposed, one of which was that there was no contract between the parties. The court held that although extensive negotiations had been carried on, nevertheless' there was no completed contract. On this ground, defendant’s motion for nonsuit was granted at the close of plaintiffs’ testimony, and judgment against plaintiffs for dismissal of the action and for costs was accordingly entered. Pierce and McCall, the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. In Re KollockSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. McKinley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. United States v. SmullSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Elks v. . Insurance CoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. I.M.A., Inc. v. Rocky Mountain Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Bill Barrett Corporation v. YMC Royalty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  3. Shoels v. KleboldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  4. New York Life Insurance v. K N Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. American Mining Co. v. Himrod-Kimball Mines Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API