Legal Opinion

Murdock v. Pope

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 9, 1964No. 20693PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Moore.

We will refer to plaintiffs in error as defendants or as the Murdocks, and to defendants in error as plaintiffs or as the Popes.

The plaintiffs sought a decree for specific performance of a written contract for the purchase and sale of certain lands, and for damages by way of abatement of a part of the purchase price because of the inability of the defendants to convey all the land described in the agreement.

At the conclusion of the trial, in which a jury was impaneled in an advisory capacity with reference to issues of fact, the trial court entered its findings of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kuper v. ScrogginsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  2. Florence Oil & Refining Co. v. McCandlessSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  3. Rule v. LinkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  4. Mullen v. BromleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rocks v. BrosiusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. Dlug v. WooldridgeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  3. Castagno v. ChurchUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Emery v. Medal Building CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  5. Rosenthal v. SanduskyColorado Court of Appeals · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API