Legal Opinion

State v. Teter

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 11, 2012No. 105,495PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Malone, J.:

Kevin Teter appeals his conviction of one count of unlawful acquisition of pseudoephedrine in violation of K.S.A. 2007 Supp. 65-7006(d) (now codified at K.S.A. 2011 Supp. 21-5709[d]). This statute makes it unlawful for any person to purchase more than 3.6 grams of pseudoephedrine base or ephedrine base in any transaction or to purchase more than 9 grams of pseudoephedrine base or ephedrine base within a 30-day period. Teter argues that the statute is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. For the reasons set forth herein, we reject Teter s constitutional challenges and conclude…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. McCaslinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. State v. VoylesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. State v. WhitesellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. State v. LaturnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. Smith v. MartensSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In the Interest of A.E.S.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
  2. White v. ShipmanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API