Legal Opinion

State v. Padilla

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 7, 1985No. 83-11-3365-C; CA A31978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Defendant was convicted of sexual abuse in the first degree. ORS 163.425. He appeals, assigning as error admission of certain expert testimony. We find no error and affirm the conviction.

The indictment charged that

“[t]he defendant, on or between September 1, 1983, and November 15, 1983, in Malheur County, Oregon did unlawfully and knowingly subject [the victim], a person of the age of 9 years, to sexual contact, by touching the vagina, a sexual part of [the victim] * *

Defendant was involved in a relationship with the victim’s mother and either resided with her and her children or, at least,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. State v. MustainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. State v. MunroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. State v. JohnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  2. State v. DaleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. State v. GherasimCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Zacher v. PettyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API