State v. Ford
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, P. J.
The state moves to dismiss this criminal appeal on the ground that defendant absconded from the jurisdiction of the court and was a fugitive from justice. ORAP 8.05(3). The state’s motion is supported by a warrant for defendant’s arrest based on his failure to comply with two conditions of probation. The motion raises the issue of whether an allegation that a defendant failed to comply with a condition of probation that does not involve reporting to authorities, together with the issuance of and a defendant’s failure to respond to an ensuing arrest warrant, constitutes sufficient grounds for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ortega-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Estelle v. DorroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. LundahlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. SternerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. RAIBURNSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- State v. FettelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- State v. HooperMarion County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
- State v. NofzigerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.