Legal Opinion

State v. RAIBURN

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 24, 2009No. 95,908PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Rosen, J.:

The fugitive disentitlement doctrine generally holds that the appeal of a criminal defendant who has absconded from the jurisdiction of the courts should be dismissed. This case requires us to decide whether the fugitive disentitlement doctrine is alive in Kansas and, if so, whether it is applicable when the record shows only that the State has alleged the defendant failed to report to his or her probation officer.

Steven L. Raibum was convicted of one count of felony possession of marijuana. He was sentenced to a term of 20 months’…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Molinaro v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Ortega-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Estelle v. DorroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1988

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DooleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  2. State v. HuckeyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
  3. State v. YazellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  4. State v. HentgesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API