Connelly v. McMahon
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Sibley county against defendant McMabon and the sureties upon bis bond as administrator de bonis non with the will annexed of the estate of Thomas McMahon, deceased, to recover $453.47, the amount of plaintiff’s claim against the estate which had been allowed by the probate court of that county.
Read the full summary
Action in the district court for Sibley county against defendant McMabon and the sureties upon bis bond as administrator de bonis non with the will annexed of the estate of Thomas McMahon, deceased, to recover $453.47, the amount of plaintiff’s claim against the estate which had been allowed by the probate court of that county. The answer, after admitting the facts stated in the complaint, alleged that the moneys of the estate in the hands of defendant as such administrator were part of the proceeds arising from the sale of the homestead of decedent and his wife which was exempt from all…
1Opinion of the CourtPhilip E. Brown, J.
On April 13, 1902, Thomas McMahon, then a resident of Sibley county, died testate. His will was duly admitted to probate on August 19, 1902, and one Thomas Bowser was appointed and qualified as executor and continued to act in such capacity until his discharge on November 22, 1910. The defendant Michael McMahon was then appointed and qualified as administrator be bonis non with the will annexed, executing a bond in the sum of $1,000, with his codefendants as sureties. The will contained the following provision :
“I order and direct that my executors hereinafter named pay all my just debts and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Larson v. CurranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Fairchild v. MarshallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Eckstein v. RadlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Radl v. RadlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Baldwin v. ZienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Estate of OvervoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932