Legal Opinion

Eckstein v. Radl

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 27, 1898No. Nos. 10,995-(134)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff, as administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Xaver Radi, deceased, from a judgment entered in the district court for Brown county in favor of the defendant pursuant to the findings and order of Webber, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

This was an action in ejectment brought by the administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Xaver Radi, deceased,— which will was involved in Radl v. Radl, supra, page 81,—■ against the same defendant, and to recover possession of the same property, the homestead of the deceased in his lifetime. We held in that case that the written assent of the surviving husband or wife to a testamentary disposition of the homestead) required under the provisions of G. S. 1894, § 4470, need not be executed or given until after the decease of the testator; and, further, that the provisions of section…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Long v. NorthupSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  2. Swisher v. SwisherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  3. Larson v. CurranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Nordlund v. DahlgrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. In re Estate of GuthrieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API