Legal Opinion
Pleatmaster, Inc. v. J. L. Golding Mfg. Co., and H. L. Judd Company, Counter-Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 8, 1957No. 11796PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff’s suit for infringement of its patent to Solomon, No. 2,558,467, applied for January 16, 1951, and allowed June 26, 1951, having resulted in a finding that the patent is valid and infringed, upon appeal, defendant seeks to reverse, contending that each finding is erroneous.
Solomon, in his application, described a curtain hanging device capable of forming pleats at the top of the curtain without sewing the material, for curtains or draperies suspended from a rod or similar support. He disclosed an apparatus with four fingers, tines or prongs, pointing upward…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Flick-Reedy Corporation v. Hydro-Line Manufacturing Company, Flick-Reedy Corporation v. Hydro-Line Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
- Rena Kardulas v. Florida MacHine Products Company, R.C. Products, Inc., and John M. DudinskyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Anderson Company v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., and Zaiger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
- United Parts Manufacturing Company v. Lee Motor Products, Inc., and Joseph KuminCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- Goldman v. BobinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.