City of Camilla v. Cochran
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
It is insisted that the plaintiffs had an ample remedy at law by affidavit of illegality, as provided by the act of August 19, 1919 (Acts 1919, p. 867), under which this paving was done; and that for this reason the trial judge erred in granting an interlocutory injunction. The affidavit of illegality provided by this *430act furnishes a sufficient remedy at law, and precludes the grant of injunctive relief, where an individual owner of land, abutting upon streets which have been paved under this act, seeks to resist the enforcement of an execution based upon…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- National Bank v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Sanders v. MayorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Mayor of Washington v. FaverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Mayor of Gainesville v. DeanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Wilkins v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sommers v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- City of Los Angeles v. OffnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- City of Macon v. RiesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Bell v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- National Linen Service Corp. v. Mayor of MilledgevilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.