Legal Opinion

Bell v. City of Topeka

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 23, 1976No. 48,039PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Kaul, J.:

This is an action instituted by plaintiffs-appellants, Rex K. and Arleta J. Bell, against the City of Topeka and members of its governing body seeking injunctive relief in preventing the city from enforcing certain ordinances levying and assessing part of the costs against their real estate for improving and widening Burlingame Road. The real estate of plaintiffs is situated adjacent to Burlingame Road and is within a benefit district created by the city in connection with the project.

Burlingame Road is one of the oldest established roads in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. BillingsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. Paul v. City of ManhattanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Mullins v. City of El DoradoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  4. Schulenberg v. City of ReadingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  5. Bowlus v. City of IolaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re the Appeal of Boeing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. State v. CostaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. McCarthy v. City of LeawoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  4. Davis v. City of LeawoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  5. Allison v. Board of Johnson County Comm'rsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API