Legal Opinion

Spellens v. Spellens

California Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1957No. Docket Nos. L.A. 23683, 22553, 23135, 23180, 23685, 23717, 23684Published

1Opinion of the Court

49 Cal.2d 210 (1957)

317 P.2d 613

ANNELEN SPELLENS, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

SOL CARL SPELLENS, Defendant and Appellant, and five connected appeals. SOL CARL SPELLENS, Appellant,

v.

ANNELEN SPELLENS, Respondent.

Docket Nos. L.A. 23683, 22553, 23135, 23180, 23685, 23717, 23684.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

October 30, 1957.

Leonard Horwin and Richard I.M. Kelton for Appellant Annelen Spellens.

Reynolds, Painter & Cherniss, Pacht, Tannenbaum & Ross, Pacht, Ross, Warne & Bernhard, Isaac Pacht, Clore Warne, Stuart L. Kadison, Harvey M. Grossman and Ellis J. Horvitz for Appellant Sol Carl…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Krause v. KrauseNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Zaragosa v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API