Legal Opinion

People v. Ayala

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 21, 1988PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Spatt, J.

In this case, we are called upon to determine whether testimony given at a suppression hearing may, pursuant to CPL 670.10, be received into evidence at a subsequent proceeding when the witness has become unavailable. We hold that suppression hearing testimony is not "testimony given by a witness at * * * a trial of an accusatory instrument” within the meaning of CPL 670.10 and, therefore, that it was error for the trial court to admit such testimony in this case. This case also presents the issue of the admissibility of the postarrest statements of two separately…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Richard Cotto v. Victor Herbert, Warden, Attica Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. People v. KernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. People v. SheehanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. People v. BilalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. People v. Van JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API