Legal Opinion

Weinberg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 1983No. WD 33476PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOWENSTEIN, Judge.

The issue presented here is as follows: may an insured tortfeasor who has not been served with process, and who appears unlikely to ever be served in a lawsuit, be treated as an uninsured motorist operating an uninsured motor vehicle within the meaning of Section 379.203 RSMo.1978, allowing an injured party to recover under the uninsured motorist provision of the policy with his or her insurance company? Section 379.203 requires all policies in this state to have such an uninsured provision. The only exception in the statute of an insured vehicle being treated as uninsured…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harrison v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. Smith v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  3. Brake v. MFA Mutual Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Ponder v. Aamco Automatic Transmission, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Want v. LeveMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rister Ex Rel. Rister v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Claire v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Loveless v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API