Loveless v. American Family Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Elliott, J.:
The Lovelesses sought bodily injury recovery from American Family Mutual Insurance Company (American Family) (their own automobile carrier) under the uninsured motorist provision of their policy and K.S.A. 40-284. The trial court granted American Family summary judgment, the Lovelesses appeal, and we affirm.
Appellants were involved in an automobile accident with Chad Johnson in Oklahoma. At the time of the accident, the Johnson vehicle was insured by Arkansas Farm Bureau and Chad was listed as an additional insured on their policy. Appellants received and rejected a settlement…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hilyard Ex Rel. Hilyard v. Estate of ClearwaterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
- McDaniel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
- Claire v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- Weinberg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by1 opinion
- Long Ex Rel. Estate of Rhoten v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009