Ingram v. City of Gridley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
Plaintiffs, husband and wife, owners of an 85-acre dairy ranch situated about one mile south of the city of Gridley, commenced this action to abate an alleged nuisance caused by waste material and sewage discharged into Morrison Slough which flows through plaintiffs’ property. They also sought damages in the sum of $2,500. The cause as to all issues was heard by the court without a jury. The judgment declared that a nuisance exists and has existed and the court retained jurisdiction as to the abatement feature in order to allow the defendants a reasonable time within which to abate the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Green v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Redlands High School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Judson v. L.A. Suburban Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Dauberman v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ruth E. Oscar Charles Spinosa v. University Students Co-Operative Association George ProperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Diaz v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Antolovich v. Brown Group Retail, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Mock v. ShulmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.