Legal Opinion

Turner v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 2012No. SD 31756PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Scott, P.J.

Darrell Turner (Movant) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief.1 He charges trial attorney William Nacy with ineffective assistance of counsel (IAC) in failing to investigate and call two alibi witnesses.

The motion court did not clearly err in denying relief. We affirm.

Background

Movant’s convictions for first-degree assault, first-degree burglary, unlawful use of a weapon, and armed criminal action were affirmed in State v. Turner, 242 S.W.3d 770 (Mo.App.2008), from which we borrow relevant facts without further attribution.

On the night in question, Christina…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bucklew v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  2. Anderson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Barnes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. TurnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. McCauley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. King v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. MICHAEL D. BURNS v. STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. John King v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. RONALD R. SPRADLING, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API