Legal Opinion

McCauley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1993No. 63037PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after we remanded his case for an evidentiary hearing to develop a record about whether his attorney’s failure to call three witnesses was a matter of trial strategy. State v. McCauley, 831 S.W.2d 741 (Mo.App.1992). We affirm.

In July. 1989, Defendant was convicted of second degree murder, first degree assault, and two counts of armed criminal action in connection with a shooting incident. Defendant filed a timely 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief alleging, inter alia, his counsel was ineffective for failing to call three…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. MooneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Childress v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Jones v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jerry L. McCauley v. Paul K. DeloCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  2. State v. Van NguyenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State v. McQuaryMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. State v. GrayMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. HillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API