Legal Opinion

O'Byrne v. Scofield

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 7, 1949No. 16,138PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

On February 10, 1927, O’Byrne contracted with one McNeill to act as his attorney in proceedings to enforce a lien on certain mining property, on which O’Byrne also claimed a lien, for a fee of one-third the recovery and with right to employ other counsel to assist him. A few weeks later, O’Byrne engaged Scofield to assist him in prosecuting this claim, and by instrument in writing, assigned to Scofield a one-half interest in his fee contract with McNeill, “including any and all rights of action which may accrue thereunder, together with all other rights of whatever nature or kind under said…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kleinclaus v. DutardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Great West Min. Co. v. Woodmas of Alston Min. Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  3. Warren v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  4. Carlson v. McNeillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  5. Berryman v. BerrymanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Davis v. BonebrakeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  2. Robbins v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. Pride v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  4. Bailey v. ClausenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  5. Hickerson v. VesselsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API