Legal Opinion

Great West Min. Co. v. Woodmas of Alston Min. Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1890PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hayt

The facts in this case, as they appeared previous to the last trial, are sufficiently set forth in the former opinions *91filed herein, and will not be again repeated. See 12 Colo. 46. The judgment of the district court of El Paso county in favor of appellees was then reversed, and the case remanded to that court, leaving counsel and the court below to pursue such course in relation to additional parties and further proceedings as they should he advised. Thereafter, by consent of parties, a change of venue was taken to the district court of Arapahoe county, and a new trial had. Upon this trial a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Sullivan v. Portland & Kennebec RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Great West Min. Co. v. Woodmas of Alston Min. Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1888

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Robbins v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. Morgan v. KingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  3. Stubbs v. McGillisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  4. French v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  5. Horton v. StegmyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API