Legal Opinion
Youngquist v. Freedom of Information Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 17, 1998No. AC 17540PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The pro se plaintiff, Eric J. Youngquist, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion for fees and expenses filed pursuant to General Statutes § 4-184a (b).1 He claims that the trial court improperly (1) concluded that the defendant freedom of information commission (commission)2 had substantial justification for its action and (2) denied his motion for reasonable fees and expenses, including the value of his time as a pro se litigant.3 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to this appeal. After the state department of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. AECO Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Connecticut Ass'n of Not-for-Profit Providers for Aging v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. RiosConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Burinskas v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Town of West Hartford v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Raymond v. Freedom of Information CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Hawks v. Reznik, No. Cv94-0119515s (Jan. 11, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
- Youngquist v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999