DeMarco v. Estlow
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
18 N.J. Super. 30 (1952)
86 A.2d 446
ANTHONY R. DeMARCO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
FRANCIS ESTLOW, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided January 29, 1952.
Mr. James D. Stockwell for plaintiff (Messrs. Bleakly, Stockwell and Zink, attorneys).
Mr. James M. Davis, Jr., attorney for defendant.
HANEMAN, J.S.C.
Prior to the filing of the answer in the above entitled cause, the defendant moved to strike the complaint on the ground that the same was insufficient in law. After argument before the Honorable C. Thomas Schettino, the motion was denied, without prejudice to the rights of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Moses v. MosesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
- Schultz v. WaldonsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1901
- Wirtz v. GuthrieNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913
- Douma v. PowersNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1920
- Nibert v. BaghurstNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kopp, Inc. v. United Technologies, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Presten v. SailerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Schnakenberg v. Gibraltar Savings and Loan Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Kufta v. HughsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Baugh v. Logan CityUtah Supreme Court · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.