Legal Opinion

Moses v. Moses

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 27, 1947PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

The original transaction here falls into the category of an oral express or direct trust. The presumption of a voluntary settlement arising from the appellant husband’s conveyance of the six parcels of land to his wife on May 6th, 1941, by deed absolute on its face, was overcome by the proofs. It was shown by clear and convincing evidence (the standard of proof in such cases) that the conveyance was made to the use of the husband. Indeed, there is no contention contra; it is conceded that the transfer was not motivated by a donative intent and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Foreman v. ForemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Neale v. NealesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  5. Freeman v. . FreemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1870

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. Hieble v. HiebleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Beverly Maeker v. William Ross (072185)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  4. Stretch v. WatsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  5. Airwork Corp. v. Markair Express, Inc. (In Re Markair Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API